Most people’s graphics cards have reached the end of their useful life. For computer games, video editing, animations, and other graphics-intensive hobbies, a few years is a lifetime. Your graphics card may not be capable of taking use of modern technologies such as smart resolution upsampling and ray-tracing acceleration because so much have changed in the last few years. The sophistication of 3D modelling and video editing software, as well as video games, has increased.
What matters is whether you’re streaming video or browsing the web; a current graphics card can increase yoursystem’s responsiveness by enhancing video decoding acceleration and displaying your screens more quickly, among other things.
There is no need to buy a new graphics card right now. Since their availability has increased recently, many people are still stuck in the “LOL, I’m trying to buy one for an affordable price” phase… Even if they’re down from their pre-launch highs, prices are still much higher than makers had hoped for six months ago: The press-release costs for a certain current-generation chip ranged from around 30 to 130 percent higher than the cheapest recommended card I could locate.
Although this is the case, we hope our guide will help you determine what to search for and which GPUs are most suited to your needs and budget if you’re ready to invest some money on a new graphics card right now! Continue reading to learn more. Specifications like the manufacturer, graphics chip, amount of video RAM, memory and gaming clock rates, power consumption, and other factors might help you predict how well a certain model would perform in your games or creative programmes.
You can use a GT 1030-based card if you have an old PC that doesn’t support the most recent versions of graphics programming interfaces like DirectX 12 or Vulkan, or if you have a game that won’t run until it recognises dedicated graphics memory (they have 2GB). So it can be used in systems with smaller power supplies and compact designs because of its low power consumption. As a result, 1030-based cards are more compact and quieter than typical gaming graphics cards because they only need one fan to cool them.
Unless a game is really lightweight, don’t expect to play at 1080p with the GeForce GT. However, if you regularly play games like Fortnite, CS:GO, League of Legends, and others that can be played on a potato, you don’t have to worry as much. There are some circumstances where a game may just become less unplayable. However, if you intend to play games, you should choose for models with DDR5 memory rather than DDR4 memory because the difference can be obvious. As a result, you’ll find items priced as little as $130. The cheapest reasonable speedup I’ve seen is $115 for a simple one.
The top entry-priced choice for basic photo editing
A fast, high-core-count CPU still provides a lot more performance value for the money than a high-powered graphics card for simple photo processing. However, for small photos and single-screen editing, you shouldn’t have any issues. The GPU is important for the user experience and smooth display rendering.
Because it hits the essentials and costs less than the more expensive step-up cards, the RX 6500 XT is the clear winner here. That’s in part due to the fact that it has the lowest markup over its $199 manufacturer-recommended price of all of the cards I looked at. Two- and three-fan models are available (the latter is usually overclocked).
It falls somewhere in between the RTX 3060 and the RTX 3060 Ti in terms of performance, but its actual price is cheaper than that of the 3060 Ti, which would usually be my option here, making it my default pick. AMD real prices are also less out of wack than Nvidia’s, so this becomes my default pick. This is a good option if you can find one with between $600 and $700 that’s of decent quality. The Asus ROG Strix RX 6600 XT OC review is available.
Best option for good 1440p, top quality 1080p, entry video editing
Though $900 and up feels like an awful lot to pay for this card, it’s a lot better than the $1,100-plus the RTX 3070 Ti costs at the moment. But it’s not a consolation prize: Its performance weaves below and above the RTX 3070 Ti, but the extra memory, 12GB vs. 8GB, can make a big difference in game quality choices and video editing performance.
An excellent option for best 1440p or entry 4K gaming, midrange video editing
When it comes to the best graphics card currently on the market, it’s a toss-up between Nvidia’s RTX 3070 Ti and AMD’s RX 480, both of which have similar costs. Individually lower RTX 3070 cards are available, however. Some workstation graphics programmes, such as those used in video editing and rendering, benefit from the RTX 3070 Ti’s increased memory bandwidth, so it’s worth considering. I still believe that paying more than $1,000 for a card that was originally intended to cost between $500 and $600 is excessive. Read our hands-on with the RTX 3070.
In general, the RX 6800 XT surpasses the RTX 3080, although it can be comparable to the RTX 3080 Ti, especially at higher resolutions and in professional graphics applications, thanks to improved memory bandwidth and more video memory. AMD’s graphics cards are just as pricey as Nvidia’s, clocking in at more than $1,500. However, the 3080 Ti is your best pick if you utilise workstation or video editing applications that makes use of Nvidia CUDA acceleration. Check out our review of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti.
The power requirements of a card should be compared to the output of your power supply at all times. The power consumption of other cards and gadgets in your system must also be taken into consideration.
Even the world’s most powerful GPU won’t help if your CPU is the bottleneck—think overkill.
Cards with the same GPU are sold at wildly differing costs. Improved cooling systems, as well as flashy (in the literal sense) aesthetics, are all instances of this trend.
Dual-card systems, in most circumstances, are a nuisance that outweighs their advantages. It’s rare for video editing to be the rule, although it does happen occasionally. Gaming benchmarks aren’t necessarily realistic if you’re looking for a graphics card to generate content. In order to begin started, look for “best GPU for Premiere” or “workstation GPUs” in a search engine. Workstation GPUs from Nvidia (formerly known as Quadro) are often more powerful than their AMD Radeon Pro or WX series counterparts, but application developers who are close to Apple—which does not support Nvidia GPUs—optimize their applications for AMD. The best example of this is Blackmagic Design’s DaVinci Resolve video editor.
Depending on the programme you’re using, a low- or mid-range graphics cardmay no longer be sufficient for photo editing. After updating Photoshop and Lightroom, Adobe began to use AI technology in a meaningful way. Photoshop’s new Replace Sky and Neural filters, for example, can benefit from the Tensor cores in Nvidia’s RTX cards, which are intended to speed up AI. If you don’t have at least 32GB of system memory, graphics programmes may benefit more from an upgrade to the GPU, unless your graphics card is fairly old.
Real-time performance while working with high-resolution video depends heavily on the graphics card’s memory (4K and up).
To play games in 4K resolution, you’ll need at least 8GB of video RAM.
Latest headlines from CNET, the premier online news source.
Subscribing to more than one CNET newsletter is a waste of time. See what our editors thought were the most noteworthy reviews, articles, and videos from the previous day.
Does Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync make a difference?
There are a few things to consider if you’re concerned about visual artefacts produced by a mismatch between your monitor’s refresh rate and your game’s frame rate, or if you’re interested in proprietary technologies like Nvidia’s Latency Analyzer that can help improve your gameplay by minimising lag. As a last resort, buy the right graphics card for your needs and use it to the best of your ability. To learn more about Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync, check out this article: Which Should I Use?
The relative performance of recent GPUs
Maingear Turbo (RTX 2080 Ti)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2004); 3.8GHz Ryzen 9 3900XT; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,600; 11GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti; 1TB SSD + 4TB HDD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3050)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (21H1); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 8GB EVGA GeForce RTX 3050 XC Black ; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2004); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2H20); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 12GB EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070 FE)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070 Ti)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (21H1); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3080 Ti)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (21H1); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 12GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RX 6500 XT)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (21H1); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 4GB Gigabyte Eagle 4G Radeon RX 6500 XT; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RX 6600 XT)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (21H1); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 8GB Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 6600 XT OC; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RX 6700 XT)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2H20); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 12GB AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RX 6800 XT)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 16GB AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RX 6800)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 16GB AMD Radeon RX 6800; 1TB SSD
MSI Trident X (RTX 2070 Super)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); (oc) 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 2,932; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super; 1TB SSD
Origin PC Chronos (RTX 3080)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2004); Intel Core i9-10900K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 10GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 (EVGA); 1TB SSD + 500GB SSD