12 Best Graphics Cards For 3D Rendering & Modeling Of 2020 – For Every Budget! » Let Me Fulfill

12 Best Graphics Cards for 3D Rendering & Modeling of 2020 – For Every Budget!

Updated on August 14, 2022


Your workstation is undoubtedly the most significant instrument in your arsenal if you are in the animation or industrial design industries or create visual effects or graphic design.

When it comes to 3D modelling and rendering, this becomes much more apparent. Of course, having a creative mind and excellent design abilities are essential, but with the correct gear, you can accurately translate what’s in your head to your monitor.

Additionally, if you’re working on a sophisticated design that requires a lot of processing power, you need the greatest graphics card for 3D rendering and modelling available.

In order to help you make an informed decision, we’re going to take a deeper look at the 12 top graphics cards for 3D rendering and modelling in 2020.

Best Graphics Cards for 3D Rendering and Modeling Professionals

A large volume of really complicated designs necessitates your 3D modelling and rendering expertise at this point. wasting 3 hours on a model that might be completed in half the time is a waste of time.

Finally, it’s time to get the greatest graphics card on the market, and we have just the answer:





Check Price



Check Price


Check Price


Check Price


Check Price

1. AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

CUDA Cores: 3584 | Base Clock: 1200MHz | Boost Clock: 1500MHz | Memory: 8GB HBM2 | Memory Clock Speed: 2000MHz | Memory Bus: 2048-bit | TMUs: 224 | ROPs: 64 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 230W | Dimensions: 10.5 x 4.4 in


  • Top notch performance
  • Enough memory for difficult 3D tasks
  • Comparable performance to WX 9100 at much lower price
  • Outperforms the Nvidia Quadro P4000
  • Supports EEC memory


  • Power hungry
  • Higher price

Our Rating:   9.8/10

AMD never fails to amaze me with how they manage to fit such a wide range of capabilities into their GPUs while keeping their costs so reasonable.

3,584. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 has that many cores as standard. Prove it to me that the quality of your renderings will be improved. This GPU is capable of rendering whatever model you throw at it. What matters is how much detail there is, how well the rendering is done, or even if your computer is doing other things.

But this isn’t even the most important part of the storey. With its Vega architecture, the Radeon Pro WX 8200 is AMD’s holy grail of workstation GPUs.

The WX 8200 outperforms the Quadro P4000 in terms of raw performance, but having a boost clock speed of just 1500 MHz.

VRAM is the only area in which the P4000 outperforms this AMD workstation GPU. Only 8GB of HBM2 VRAM is available with the Radeon Pro WX 8200. Experts in the industry have even debated this topic, but I believe that the reduced VRAM is what has kept this GPU under $1000.

However, you won’t really grasp the significance of this GPU’s mistake correction capabilities until you learn about them. The price of a GPU with this feature is extremely rare.

Even its power consumption can attest to the power of this GPU. Second only to the RX Vega 64 in terms of power draw, the WX 230 is the most powerful of the WX series.

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a fantastic pick if you’re looking for a high-end graphics card that doesn’t break the budget.

See It On Amazon

2. PNY NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

CUDA Cores: 2304 | Base Clock: 1005MHz | Boost Clock: 1545MHz | Memory: 8GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock Speed: 13000MHz | Memory Bus: 256-bit | TMUs: 144 | ROPs: 64 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 160W | Dimensions: 10.5 x 4.4 x in

PNY Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000REASONS TO BUY

  • Outperforms the P4000 and P6000
  • 8GB of VRAM
  • Optimized for CAD applications
  • Low power consumpition
  • Supports ray tracing
  • Single slot GPU


  • Higher price

Our Rating:   9.7/10

However, despite its hefty price, the PNY Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 is an excellent value. Using the Turing architecture, real-time ray tracing is one of its most prominent characteristics.

This GPU has a base clock speed of 1005 MHZ, however it can reach a maximum clock speed of 1545 MHZ when under intense processing load.

CAD applications like AutoCAD and SolidWorks benefit greatly from the Quadro 4000’s creative-work-optimized design. This means the plugins and filters in these programmes are accelerated in a visible way and performance is increased in areas like perspective and animation.

Anti-aliasing and wireframe drops are also made more precise as a result. As a result, rendering times have been sped up and rendering quality has improved dramatically.

You’ll also appreciate the Quadro RTX 4000 graphics card’s ample 8GB of VRAM for storing files you need quickly.

As an added bonus, the GPU includes 2304 CUDA cores for rapid graphics, as well as 288 Tensor and 36 RT cores for deep learning. At 10 giga-rays per second, the RT cores boost the computation of how light and sound travel in 3D settings.

The Quadro RTX 4000’s FP16 performance, which is generally reserved for gaming GPUs, should also be mentioned. Your 3D activities will run faster as a result of this.

Again, the low power consumption of this graphics card will likely surprise you. Although 160 watts may appear to be a lot, the RTX’s performance makes it an excellent value.

See It On Amazon

3. Asus ROG STRIX GeForce RTX 2080Ti

CUDA Cores: 4352 | Base Clock: 1350MHz | Boost Clock: 1665MHz | Memory: 11GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock Speed: 14000MHz | Memory Bus: 352-bit | TMUs: 272 | ROPs: 88 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 260W | Dimensions: 12 x 5.1 x 2.1 in


  • Great all-round graphics card
  • Offers 11GB of VRAM
  • Supports DLSS and Ray Tracing
  • Runs cool and quiet
  • High bandwidth


  • Premium price

Our Rating:   9.6/10


The ASUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ranked third. A massive 4532 CUDA cores offer unrivalled visuals and framerates on this monster. It is also capable of displaying images in a resolution of up to 4K.

The real-time ray tracing is the primary selling point of this graphics card, as is the case with other RTX graphics cards. The RTX 2080Ti’s accuracy and efficiency are the main things that set it apart.

That’s nearly twice as much hardware as Nvidia’s RTX 2080, which can produce up to 10 Giga Rays per Second (Gbps) in acceleration. Because of the inclusion of the DLSS hardware, you may enjoy ray tracing’s photo-realistic lighting without experiencing a dip in frame rates. In addition, the graphics processing power has been nearly doubled.

With its 616Gbps memory capacity, Nvidia’s RTX 2080ti can move data from its GDDR6 VRAM quickly to the GPU. There are 11GB of GDDR6 VRAM available for use. Boost clock speed is 1635MHz for this GPU. A self-implemented overclock can increase the speed even further.

The RTX 2080Ti’s power consumption isn’t substantially greater than the previous generation’s cards, despite its massive computing capacity. With 260 Watts, it outperforms the GTX 1080 Ti’s output by a factor of 10.

As previously said, if you have a mid-range workstation, you should avoid using this GPU. The RTX 2080Ti requires a top-of-the-line workstation to take full advantage of its computing capabilities.

See It On Amazon

4. AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Stream Processors: 2304 | Base Clock: 1188MHz | Boost Clock: 1243MHz | Memory: 8GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock Speed: 7000MHz | Memory Bus: 256-bit | TMUs: 144 | ROPs: 32 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 130W | Dimensions: 15 x 9.7 x 3 in


  • Excellent price to performance ratio
  • Supports up to 4x 4k screens
  • Single-slot form factor
  • 8GB of VRAM
  • Also good for gaming


  • Needs proper cooling
  • Doesn’t support Ray Tracing

Our Rating:   9.4/10

In terms of performance, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is one of the best WX-series GPUs for professional visualisation, simulation, and rendering.

However, the pricing of this Graphics card is what will pique your interest. It’s hard to imagine that the card competes on the same level as higher-priced Nvidia options we suggest for 3D modelling and rendering professionals.

The GPU is built on the revolutionary Polaris architecture and is suitable for virtual reality applications.

In order to combine several high-quality videos from cameras at various angles, which is standard for creating an immersive virtual reality experience, the 2304 streaming processors on the HTC Vive are a major contributing factor.

Besides that, this GPU has been tuned for use with AutoCAD and SolidWorks, two of the most popular modelling and rendering applications on the market today

To make use of the GPU, AMD worked with industry giants including Nuke, a visual effects tool, and rendering applications like Octane-render and V-ray.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 has no problem accelerating the graphics on multiple displays, as is the case with most professionals in this field. It doesn’t matter if all of them have 4K video playback capabilities.

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 isn’t designed for gaming, as is the case with virtually every other workstation GPU. However, if you’re looking for a way to relax after a long day of 3D work, this is the game for you.

In addition to its performance, this card’s low power consumption is a big plus. It does not put additional strain on your power source because it is powered by a 6-way PCIe power connector.

Unless you need CUDA for your professional job, the WX 7100 is a wonderful and affordable alternative to the Nvidia P4000 that I will be examining next.

See It On Amazon

5. PNY Nvidia Quadro P4000

CUDA Cores: 1792 | Base Clock: 1202MHz | Boost Clock: 1480MHz | Memory: 8GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock Speed: 7604MHz | Memory Bus: 256-bit | TMUs: 112 | ROPs: 64 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 105W | Dimensions: 9.49 x 4.37 x 0.75 in

Nvidia Quadro P4000REASONS TO BUY

  • Optimized for popular design applications
  • Great performance for 3D tasks
  • Won’t break the bank
  • Single-slot form factor
  • 8GB of VRAM


  • Doesn’t have an HDMI port
  • Doesn’t support Ray Tracing

Our Rating:   9.2/10

For those on a tight budget, go no further than the Nvidia Quadro P4000. Most people can handle this. Inquire first about the Quadro P5000’s 16GB VRAM, 288Gbps memory bandwidth, and 2560 CUDA cores before you spend your hard-earned cash.

Is my hardware setup adequate to get the most out of them? No? With less demanding GPUs like the Quadro P4000, you’d be better off. Because of this, you’ll have enough of cash to upgrade other parts of your computer.

8GB of GDDR5 RAM means you don’t have to worry about your machine running out of memory when you’re rendering. Thanks to its 1792 CUDA cores, this GPU is capable of managing picture quality exceeding 1080p.

Large models, sceneries and assemblies may be handled by the GPU with ease thanks to all of these features combined.

It’s one of the most powerful VR-ready options if you want to test your designs in virtual reality. In addition, there’s just one available place in the game. Because the P4000 lacks an HDMI connector, you’ll need a converter to utilise it with VIVE or Oculus VR headsets.

Additionally, this graphics card has four display connectors, which will improve the quality of graphics on your 4K displays.

In comparison to GPUs based on the Maxwell architecture, this one features the NVidia Pascal architecture.

To ensure compatibility with the most recent releases of OpenGL, DirectX, Vulkan, and Nvidia CUDA, the Quadro P4000 comes packaged with a driver installation CD. Because of this, you can use this card to render video in any of the most popular design programmes.

An auxiliary power cable, stereo mount, and DisplayPort-to-DCI-D SL Adapter are all included in the bundle.

In the market for a high-end graphics card from Nvidia but don’t want to spend more than $1,000, the Nvidia Quadro P4000 might be a good fit.

See It On Amazon

Best Graphics Cards for 3D Rendering and Modeling for Advanced Users

At this stage, you are fully acquainted with 3D rendering and modeling. You can create complex models and need a significantly higher processing power to render your models efficiently. However, you are still not getting enough returns to invest in the highest-end GPU.

These are your options:





Check Price


Check Price


Check Price


Check Price

1. AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

Stream Processors: 1792 | Base Clock: 713MHz | Boost Clock: 1086MHz | Memory: 8GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock Speed: 1.25GHz | Memory Bus: 256-bit | TMUs: 112 | ROPs: 32 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 75W | Dimensions: 2.87 x 11.50 x 9.49 in


  • Supports popular design softwares
  • Excellent performance for the money
  • Compact form factor
  • Very low power consumption
  • Perfect mid-range professional GPU
  • 8GB of VRAM


  • Slightly higher price

Our Rating:   9.8/10

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a fantastic mid-range GPU with a workstation-oriented design and tiny footprint. If you have a modest workstation, you won’t have any issues with it.

The fact that the WX 5100 is an update to the Radeon Fire Pro series tells you what to expect even before we discuss its performance rating.

Designers that frequently use many monitors for rendering would benefit greatly from this GPU. There are four display connectors on the board, making it simple to use several displays at the same time.

Moreover, it comes with all the necessary connectors included in its packaging.

With a memory bandwidth of 160Gbps, the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has an amazing 8GB GDDR5 VRAM. Because of the GPU’s large memory capacity, it can store an infinite number of files for use in modelling and rendering, which speeds up the process.

The Radeon Pro WX 5100, on the other hand, is built on the Polaris architecture, which makes full use of all available resources to deliver computational power that is simply unsurpassed.

In addition, you’d expect all of that improved performance to drain the battery quickly, but that’s not the case. It requires only 75 watts of power to operate. Astonishing proof of the Polaris architecture’s possibilities.

Amazingly, you won’t see any degradation in system speed when using this graphics card for 3D rendering and other tasks.

This is mostly due to the 1792 streaming processors, the 256-bit bus width, the 32 ROPs, and the 160Gbps memory bandwidth, all of which make it easy to transmit data from the GPU to the system and back again.

Even while gaming performance isn’t a big selling point, if you’re looking to unwind with a game, this graphics card will deliver.

Last but not least, I would like to applaud AMD for their efforts in ensuring that well-known design applications like Maya, Blender, and the Adobe suite will all support the WX5100 when it was released. The firm has always struggled with software compatibility.

See It On Amazon

2. PowerColor AMD Radeon RED Dragon RX 580

Stream Processors: 2304 | Base Clock: 1257MHz | Boost Clock: 1350MHz | Memory: 8GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock Speed: 8000MHz | Memory Bus: 256-bit | TMUs: 144 | ROPs: 32 | Max. Monitors Supported: 5 | Power Consumption: 185W | Dimensions: 10.40 x 6.18 x 2.24 in

PowerColor AMD Radeon RED Dragon RX 580REASONS TO BUY

  • Excellent budget pick for advanced users
  • Great performance for 1080p
  • Also great for gaming
  • 8GB of VRAM
  • Runs cool and quíet


  • Not as powerful for more demanding tasks

Our Rating:   9.7/10

Compared to the RX 570, the AMD Radeon RX 580 is the best budget GPU for 3D rendering and modelling for advanced users.

Even if it’s a little more expensive than the RX 570, there’s good reason for it. When it comes to boost speeds, the RX 580 can hit 1350MHZ while the 570 can only get to 1286MHZ. Try overclocking, but don’t expect to get an additional 50Hz of performance.

This GPU’s cores are clocked at 1257MHZ while you’re not dealing with sophisticated 3D models and renders.

In addition to the 14nm FinFET process that makes the 570 a beast, the RX 580 has the same upgraded Polaris architecture and 14nm FinFET process.

The AMD RX 580 boasts 2304 stream processors, which is more than enough for optimal shading performance and faster rendering times. The RX570 has 32 ROPs, while the RX580 has 144 texture units, making it more efficient at adding texture to your models.

In order to complete your models and renderings, you will need more texture packs and other resources than this GPU can manage with its 8GB of GDDR5.

When it comes to 3D work and gaming, the PowerColor AMD Radeon RED Dragon RX 580 delivers excellent results. In conclusion, this graphics card offers a lot for a low price.

See It On Amazon

3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 O6G Evo

CUDA Cores: 1920 | Base Clock: 1365MHz | Boost Clock: 1785MHz | Memory: 6GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock Speed: 14000MHz | Memory Bus: 192-bit | TMUs: 120 | ROPs: 48 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 175W | Dimensions: 9.5 x 5.1 x 2.1 in


  • Supports Ray Tracing and DLSS
  • Great performance for the money
  • Also great for gaming
  • Attractive design


  • Only 6GB of VRAM
  • Issues with overheating

Our Rating:   9.5/10

If you desire the RTX 20 series’ processing capability but can’t afford the RTX 2080, what are your options? You decide to buy the RTX 2060 graphics card. Is not the cheapest graphics card, but it is the cheapest RTX series card available today.

For less than $350, you can experience the full potential of the ray tracing and DLSS technologies that gamers and designers can’t stop talking about.

In this price range, a better performing and more future-proof graphics card is almost certainly to be found.

The 6GB of GDDR6 VRAM on the GeForce RTX 2060 makes it possible to model and render more quickly by storing frequently used resources such as textures, geometry, and forms.

There is a significant pricing difference between this card and the RTX 2070 it replaces. The increased pricing of the RTX 2070 does not make sense to me, which is why I will not be endorsing it.

It’s just my opinion. I’m willing to sacrifice a few frames per second in order to save $200. The RTX 2060’s 1,920 CUDA cores are less powerful than the RTX 2070’s 2,304 CUDA cores, therefore you pay for that.

In order to get the full frame rate, you should go with the RTX 2070, which has 2GB more VRAM than the RTX 2060.

In addition to the Tu106 processor, an 8-pin connector, and two fans for effective cooling, both graphics cards come with the following. Thermal throttling can be prevented by using the latter. When the GPU overheats, the core clock speed decreases.

ASUS has already overclocked the GeForce RTX 2060, which has a boost core speed of 1785MHZ.

See It On Amazon

4. PNY Nvidia Quadro P2000

CUDA Cores: 1024 | Base Clock: 1076MHz | Boost Clock: 1480MHz | Memory: 5GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock Speed: 1752MHz | Memory Bus: 160-bit | TMUs: 64 | ROPs: 40 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 75W | Dimensions: 7.7 x 4.4 x 2 in

Nvidia Quadro P2000REASONS TO BUY

  • Low power consumption
  • Optimized for a lot of 3D applications
  • Compact form factor
  • Great performance


  • Only 5GB of VRAM
  • Higher Price
  • Doesn’t support Ray Tracing

Our Rating:   9.4/10

If you’re looking for a budget-friendly option for rendering, CAD, and design work, this is an excellent choice. Nevertheless, the Quadro P2000 will have issues if you overtax it by rendering scenes with an excessive amount of information.

The GPU’s base clock speed is 1076 MHz, although it may reach 1480 MHz when under heavy stress.

If you’re not modelling and producing really complicated things, 5GB of GDDR5 VRAM should be sufficient. An incredible 140Gbps of memory bandwidth will ensure that files are loaded into the GPU from the VRAM as quickly as they’re being processed, allowing the GPU to be fully used.

As a result, your models’ render times will be slashed.

The P2000 has four display ports that can power up to four monitors at the same time. For 4K playback at 144Hz, you can only power two displays at the same time.

A Quadro workstation GPU based on the Pascal architecture would benefit from this graphics card’s low power consumption of 75W.

Best Graphics Cards for 3D Rendering and Modeling for Beginners/Hobbyist

At this stage, you don’t want to spend too much on a graphics card because your performance needs are low or you are not sure 3D rendering and modeling is something you will pursue in the long term. Still, you need a powerful GPU that won’t need immediate replacement as soon as things start becoming serious.

These are your options:





Check Price


Check Price


Check Price

1. XFX Radeon RX 570 RS XXX Edition

Stream Processors: 2048 | Base Clock: 1168MHz | Boost Clock: 1286MHz | Memory: 8GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock Speed: 7000 MHz | Memory Bus: 256-bit | TMUs: 128 | ROPs: 32 | Max. Monitors Supported: 6 | Dimensions: 9.57 x 4.88 x 1.57 in


  • Excellent value pick
  • 8GB of VRAM
  • Perfect for 1080p resolution models
  • Also great for gaming


  • No ray tracing or DLSS
  • Not suited for UHD

Our Rating:   9.8/10

It was just a matter of time before we recommended an AMD GPU as the best graphics card for novices. It’s the only company selling a graphics card that’s fast enough for 3D modelling and rendering for under $200.

Polaris GPU architecture, as seen in the RX 470, is carried over to the Radeon RX 570, although with minor tweaks.

Additionally, the GPU has 2048 stream processors to ensure superior shading results for your 3D models. The outstanding 1168MHz base core speed only serves to amplify this point. This can reach a maximum of 1286MHz at full load.

The RX 570 contains 128 texture mapping units and 32 Render Operations Units to speed up the process of filling your models with textures.

Modeling and rendering at this level will never be hampered by a lack of memory, thanks to the 8GB of GDDR5 VRAM. These files are transferred from VRAM to the GPU at a blisteringly high pace of 7000MHz.

By way of a 256-bit interface, the graphics card communicates with the operating system.

As a result of its budget, the Radeon RX 570 lacks the ability to do ray tracing and DLSS. The Nvidia GTX 1050 lacks these features and is outclassed by the AMD RX 570.

When comparing this GPU to Nvidia’s GTX 1060, I would choose the more expensive option.

Unfortunately, this GPU will have trouble rendering models at resolutions higher than 1080p. There are no plans to create ultra HD variants, therefore I think it’s a good choice for newcomers.

In addition, the XFX version of this GPU, which I suggest, has three additional features worth mentioning.

XFX True clock is the first BIOS-controlled overclocking feature. Because the overclocking work is delegated to hardware components rather than software, your PC’s clock speeds will remain stable even if its overall performance drops.

The second feature is the XFX OC+ capability, which allows you to increase your core speeds beyond the XFX True clock.

Finally, XFX lets you keep your VRM and memory as well as your GPU cool for maximum performance.

If you’re looking for a graphics card with a wide range of features at a low price, this is it.

See It On Amazon

2. MSI GeForce GTX 1660Ti Ventus XS 6G OC

CUDA Cores: 1536 | Base Clock: 1700MHz | Boost Clock: 1830MHz | Memory: 6GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock Speed: 12.000MHz | Memory Bus: 192-bit | TMUs: 96 | ROPs: 48 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 120W | Dimensions: 8.03 x 5.04 x 1.65 in


  • Competitive pricing
  • Excellent for gaming as well
  • High memory clock speed
  • Excellent Nvidia budget pick for 3D work
  • Great cooling solution by MSI


  • No ray tracing and DLSS
  • Only 6GB of VRAM

Our Rating:   9.7/10

Powered by the Nvidia 1660ti, the 1000 series is making a comeback. The Turing architecture is included in the GPU. Tensors and RT partitions are absent from the TU116 core of the GTX, in contrast to the TU102 core of the RTX series.

To put it another way, you won’t get any benefit from GPUs like the Nvidia RTX 2060’s ability to simulate realistic light rays. In addition, DLSS functionalities are not available.

The 12nanometer FinFET technology, as used in the GTX 1060, ensures exceptional shader performance. The GTX 1660 Ti has 1,536 CUDA cores to help with shading and minimise render times.

This GPU has a basic clock speed of 1700MHZ, but this can go to 1830MHZ as the demand increases. As a result, your rendering time will be reduced, and your shading performance will improve.

In my opinion, this graphics card has enough memory to handle most of the modelling and rendering tasks you’ll encounter as a novice. Still, it would have been nice to have more VRAM given that practically all other GDDR6 graphics cards contain at least 8GB of data.

The GTX 1660 Ti, despite its increased performance, consumes extremely little electricity. To get the most bang for your buck, I’d go with a 450W power supply instead of the standard 120W.

Afterburner Overclocking, which can be operated wirelessly via Android and iOS devices, is a bonus feature that comes with the MSI GTX 1660 Ti I’m suggesting.

It also comes with the MSI dual fan system, which promises increased airflow and static pressure for more effective cooling.

Finally, this GPU has all the other Turing characteristics, such as simultaneous int and fp operations, quick fp 16 packed math, and an enhancement in the cache and hierarchical structure of the cache.

See It On Amazon

3. PNY NVIDIA Quadro K1200

CUDA Cores: 512 | Base Clock: 1058MHz | Boost Clock: 1124MHz | Memory: 4GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock Speed: 5000MHz | Memory Bus: 128-bit | TMUs: 32 | ROPs: 16 | Max. Monitors Supported: 4 | Power Consumption: 45W | Dimensions: 6.30 x 3.50 x 2.70 in


  • Compact form factor
  • Very low power consumption
  • Comes optimized for AutoCAD and Solidworks
  • Reasonable price for a professional GPU


  • Old architecture
  • Lower performance
  • Only 4GB of VRAM

Our Rating:   9.5/10

This is another low-cost GPU that is ideal for beginners and hobbyists in 3D rendering. When you first look at the PNY Nvidia Quadro K1200, you’ll note that it has a simple, compact form.

Since the Quadro K1200 can be installed in virtually any workstation, this is something we’ve come to anticipate from workstation GPUs.

It has a paltry 512 CUDA cores, as you can guess from their little number. As a result, rendering times will be much longer, and models with a lot of fine detail will have difficulty processing.

The GPU’s Maxwell architecture, which is about two generations old, doesn’t help matters either. I’m recommending this GPU for novices, so this shouldn’t pose an issue.

The 4GB of GDDR5 VRAM should be plenty to store any 3D modelling and rendering data that you’re using. At 80Gbps, information is transferred between the VRAM and the GPU.

Because the graphics card has been optimised for AutoCAD and SOLIDWORKS, creating photorealistic renders will be a breeze.

In addition to the 32 texture mapping units, the Quadro K1200 has 16 ROPs, which help increase the quality of your rendered images.

This GPU has a core speed of 1058MHz at normal load, which climbs to 1124MHz when the load increases.

Those who frequently utilise several monitors will be pleased to learn that the K1200 has four mini-display connectors and four mini-display to display adapters built in. Additionally, the box includes a full-height mounting bracket and a driver installation disc that I would not recommend using because it is obsolete.

You can purchase NVS 510 brackets if your package does not include the full-height bracket that some customers have complained about. They’re the same.

Quadro K1200 is often compared to the Nvidia GTX 980, but while it can’t match the GTX’s gaming capabilities, it is the best CAD/CAM rendering card. ‘

Quadro K1200 is the only workstation GPU with this level of memory performance at this low a price point.

See It On Amazon

Why You Need The Best Graphics Card for 3D Rendering and Modeling

Surface modelling, extrusions, lofts, sweeps, and shelling are just a few of the many resource-intensive tasks that your system will have to deal with. To make things run more smoothly, a GPU will take some of the workload off of your CPU.

It is possible to work on your models in a more realistic view rather than the basic wireframe and conceptual views provided by some modelling tools. Your software will not lag as a result of this because of a weak GPU.

Using a powerful graphics card will speed up the rendering process, especially for more intricate models. While CPUs have only a few sophisticated cores, GPUs have hundreds or thousands of specialised cores that divide the rendering task.

Smooth zooming and rotation will be possible thanks to this. What you don’t know is how much of an impact these basic tasks have on your body and mind. In addition, how many times will you put your models through the wringer? Uncountable.

Assembling models from separate components will be a breeze with the right graphics card.

There are several factors to consider when choosing a graphics card for your models and renderings. The vast majority of the available options were developed with gamers in mind, which explains why there are so many of them.

How can this be? I thought they were made to play games, not produce 3D models.

Gaming Graphic Cards Vs Professional Graphic Cards

The geometry used by games is heavily tuned to ensure optimal efficiency, so your graphics card isn’t taxed to the same extent that your 3D models are.

Gaming cards may not require as much VRAM, higher memory bandwidth, or computing power as 3D rendering cards, as a result.

Only workstation graphics cards are capable of this level of graphical computing. When it comes to AI and scientific computation, these are the greatest cards.

Check the system requirements for the 3D modelling and rendering software you use before acquiring a GPU.

Adobe premiere pro, for example, requires at least 2GB of GPU VRAM to render raw HD or 4K films.

Also, check out our list of the best PSUs under $50.

Factors to Consider Before Purchasing a Graphics Card for 3D Modeling and Rendering

Nvidia vs AMD

It can be difficult to choose between Nvidia and AMD, the two most popular graphics card manufacturers. Consumers can find AMD’s mid-level GPUs to be a good compromise between price and performance. For rendering, AMD’s Radeon Pro and Firepro series are the finest options.

However, Nvidia’s performance and efficiency are well-known. If you’re serious about 3D modelling and rendering, go no further than Nvidia’s Titan and Quadro lineups.

It’s possible to find GPUs from different manufacturers like MSI and ASUS. Gigabyte and MSI are other popular options. These are all Nvidia or AMD-powered graphics cards. It’s as simple as taking them and customising them with, say, a different cooler or I/O port or, in certain situations, a faster processor.

The design of the GPU chip
This is a technical term describing the process by which the GPU is constructed. About every two years, Nvidia and AMD release new technologies, each with improved capabilities and a better ability to utilise the GPU resources that are available.

For example, a Turing-based Nvidia graphics card with 2000 cores will be more efficient than a Pascal-based graphics card with the same number of cores.

When it comes to professional-level 3D modelling and rendering, Nvidia Turing is the most widely acknowledged architecture. When it comes to AMD, the Polaris and Vega architectures are what you need.

GPU Random-Access Memory
There’s a big difference between a graphics card’s video memory (VRAM) and your computer’s system memory (RAM). Although it works in the same manner,

For 3D modelling and rendering, you can use the VRAM to temporarily store data like textures, geometry, and forms. This makes it easier to access the data when needed.

Having more VRAM in a GPU allows it to store more data, therefore making it more powerful.

Even yet, when it comes to memory, the memory bandwidth is an important consideration when comparing 3D graphics cards. In Gigabits per second, it measures the speed at which data is transferred from the VRAM to the GPU.

GPU Connected Bus
It is the bus’s width that dictates the speed at which data may be transmitted between the GPU and the rest of your system.

The frequency of the GPU’s internal clock.
This is a measure of the GPU cores’ speed, commonly referred to as the “core clock.” As the clock speed of the GPU rises, so too does the rendering speed. Most cards have a base clock and a boost clock, the latter of which indicates how fast the card cores can run when the card is under heavy stress.

Please keep in mind that the GPU clock speed may only be used to compare graphics cards of the same generation. For this reason, comparing the performance of GPUs from various generations using this statistic is incorrect.

As previously stated, the card with a more complex architecture will make better use of the available resources than the standard card.

The core count
When a graphics card has more processing cores, it is able to render faster. The cores of the GPU are also known as shaders since they are responsible for displaying shaded 3D objects and sceneries.

Programming language for Nvidia’s cores called CUDA is also used to identify the physical cores.

AMD’s cores, on the other hand, are referred to as “stream processors” and are programmed in OpenCL.

Using the number of cores as a metric for comparing the performance of different generations of graphics cards would be erroneous for the same reasons as before.

The Unit for Mapping Texture (TMU)
This component aids in the application of textures to 3D models. The faster your graphics card fills your models with texture, the more TMUs it possesses.

In order to improve ray-tracing and anti-aliasing, Render Operation Unit (ROP) ROPs are used. As a result of the Render Operation Units, your GPU is able to display every pixel regardless of the texture while rendering. If your graphics card has more ROPs than necessary, you’ll get better results with your rendering.

In the end, the graphics card you choose for your 3D modelling and rendering workstation will be determined by your budget.

However, I’m hoping that after reading this, you’ll know when to push yourself a little farther in order to acquire the best GPU for your job.